102" steel whip as base set up

A place to ask questions about base setup for CB radios or HAM radios. Talk about your experiences, seek advice, and share knowledge.
Post Reply
User avatar
slowpoke1w
4 PILL USER
4 PILL USER
Posts: 25
Joined: July 25th, 2010, 10:36 am
Real Name: joey
Antenna: 10k wanna be bigcat
Radio: uniden 78

102" steel whip as base set up

#373693

Post by slowpoke1w »

I'm currently running a 102" stainless steel whip as a base. Mounted 41' on a pushup pole with 2 ground radials 102" long as the first part of my guy wires. My local buddies keep saying I need get a 5/8 wave antenna. But I out talk any radio around that has a imax2000 or an A99. Can keep up with the Maco v5/8 too. And skip is crazy with the 1/4 wave. So what's your guys opinions? Should I waste my money on up grading my setup just to say I have aa 5/8 wave antenna? Or save up for my tower and beams. Oh and I have the smallest radio out of all the locals around Jesup,Ga around 170w.
Real radios glow in the dark!
Deleted User 14541

Re: 102" steel whip as base set up

#373694

Post by Deleted User 14541 »

The 5/8 wave will be an improvement if assembled and tuned correctly. The a99 and imax are decent antennas but what you have works too. I ran a 102 with some radials when I first started out and switching to an a99 (actually a workman bandit 2) didn't make a lot of difference. Unless you test each antenna in the exact same location you can't really say one is working better than the other. Same goes for skip, there are too many variables to do a fair comparison.
User avatar
Buzzweiser
Skipshooter
Skipshooter
Posts: 407
Joined: November 2nd, 2012, 5:49 am
Handle: Peacemaker
Real Name: Dave 656
Antenna: Performer 5000
Radio: Custom Built 2970N4
Contact:

Re: 102" steel whip as base set up

#373704

Post by Buzzweiser »

The 102" whip is probably the best antenna ever made hands down. The reason is that it will work well for any cb application you want to use it for. That said a 5/8 wave antenna will work better for a base antenna. But do yourself a favor and don't cheap out on one. Get a good quality 5/8wave. I have the new Penetrator and man what a difference. Sirio also has some better ones as well. The Maco and IMax aren't bad antenna's but I wanted something better. The 5/8 will put your signal farther out on the horizon and give you more local range and a better DX angle.
User avatar
MDYoungblood
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10,740
Joined: June 12th, 2010, 8:05 pm
Handle: MDYoungblood
Real Name: Gregory
Antenna: HyGain AV-6160
Radio: Icom IC-746 (non pro)
Contact:

Re: 102" steel whip as base set up

#373705

Post by MDYoungblood »

You basically have a 1/4 wave ground plane antenna, they were sold for years by the big name antenna manufacturers, I had a Antenna Specialist 1/4 wave on top of my tower before changing it to a Moonraker 4. The sloped down radials give it a low angle of radiation which it what you have. I'll say if it's working, don't fix it.
But now that the sunspot cycle if declining you might want to look at a 5/8 or .64 antenna, preferably metal, the HyGain Penetrator, Wilson V58, or the Sirio S-827.
So you said your saving for a beam and tower, what type of beam are you looking for, that could make the purchase of an antenna different than the ones suggested.

3's

Greg
"321, West Manchester Township, PA"

Official Moderator - CBRT Complaint Department
Post Reply