HAPPY BIRTHDAY MDYOUNGBLOOD!

SSB VS. AM Transmit Distances

Whether you're new to using single sideband (SSB) or have years of experience, this forum is the perfect place to ask your questions or provide assistance to those who are new.
User avatar
De_Wildfire
Donor
Donor
Posts: 950
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 7:46 pm
Handle: De_Wildfire
Real Name: Greg
Antenna: Imax 2000. Hex Beam, G5RV dipole, Jpole(UHF/VHF) Austin Suburban Tri Band (UHF/VHF)
Radio: Washington, Tram D201, Tram D64, Robyn 520D, Cobra 139XLR, Elecraft K3S, Kenwood 590S, Yaesu FTM 400DR, Alinco DR-235, ADI-146
Contact:

Re:

#244799

Post by De_Wildfire »

Tucker Terra wrote:Ya, I am loving the SSB, alot more privacy........ My buds and I can all talk on the SSB without having other people talking on the channel, where as on the regular AM, about every channel is full of people
You really want privacy? Use a keyer (side paddles from Bencher) on the RCI 2995 and use the CW mode on that radio. They have them on some other 10 meter radios too. CW cuts through all the noise and gets over all the trouble makers. The only problem is someone else has to know CW but there are cheap code readers out there too.
User avatar
TheCBDoctor
Sponsor
Sponsor
Posts: 2,823
Joined: March 13th, 2009, 2:54 pm
Handle: Rick
Real Name: Rick
Antenna: Wilson 2000
Radio: HR 2510
Contact:

Re: SSB VS. AM Transmit Distances

#244825

Post by TheCBDoctor »

Hi,

Rule of thumb when it comes to SSB is doubling the distance in line of sight communications over AM. Sideband is 4 times as efficient as AM. Each time you quadruple your power you double the distance. Skip is another animal altogether.
Respectfully as always,

Rick
User avatar
'Doc

Re: SSB VS. AM Transmit Distances

#244830

Post by 'Doc »

And just because it was mentioned, don't bother about those code readers. They are terrible, very easy to 'fool' and never reliable. The only code reader that's worth having require lots of work, and is located between your ears.
- 'Doc
User avatar
De_Wildfire
Donor
Donor
Posts: 950
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 7:46 pm
Handle: De_Wildfire
Real Name: Greg
Antenna: Imax 2000. Hex Beam, G5RV dipole, Jpole(UHF/VHF) Austin Suburban Tri Band (UHF/VHF)
Radio: Washington, Tram D201, Tram D64, Robyn 520D, Cobra 139XLR, Elecraft K3S, Kenwood 590S, Yaesu FTM 400DR, Alinco DR-235, ADI-146
Contact:

Re: SSB VS. AM Transmit Distances

#246462

Post by De_Wildfire »

SSB way to go. I don't care for AM anyway. If I ever come over the neighbors stuff, at least they won't understand me on SSB. SSB is for longer distances.
User avatar
madsage
Wordwide & Qualified
Wordwide & Qualified
Posts: 511
Joined: December 17th, 2006, 10:12 am
Real Name: RiFFRaFF
Radio: Magnum S45, Cobra2K
Contact:

Re:

#246491

Post by madsage »

linx wrote:If you're serious about SSB, then there's only 2 radio's on the market....the 2950DX and 2970DX by RCI.

Linx.. come on man.. there are ony two radios? hehe didnt know you worked for RCI. (just kidding)

These are great radios without a doubt, and possibly the best ever produced with SSB in mind,

but you know there are some other very good radios out there too, I'd put my Magnum S45 up against the 2950dx any day.
And it would blow that RCI out of the water on AM without even trying. =]

Galaxy 99v has a long standing reputation of its own as well. And there was nothing wrong with the MB8719 radios either.
HR2510 is another very famous SSB radio, some would argue its as good as the RCI's. Anyways not to start a brand war..

respectfully,

933 Arizona
Post Reply