And mind you, your average Technician class Ham isn't likely to be broadcasting on 10m, even though it's allowed, because it's a spendy, specialized radio. The radio that virtually all new Technician hams get are line-of-sight, depend-on-repeater handy-talkies in the 144 & 440 mHz range.
Second question, is why are we all told we need a Ham license for emergency communications? Why not CB? I've asked this of our instructors but have gotten answers that are not terribly satisfying, such as:
- (1) nobody is monitoring CB frequencies in an emergency. Or, more accurately, no police, fire, or emergency services are monitoring CB freqs in emergencies. Is this true?? Whatever happened to channel 9?
- (2) no repeaters for 49 mHz (Are they really needed? In a disaster you don't need to call out that far...and if you did, your SSB will get you out there)
- (3) CB frequencies are uncontrolled, and will be chaotic in an emergency.
I dunno, those sound like weak arguments against CB. To my thinking, the 27 mHz bands are about ideal for community-response emergency communications. So I must be missing something.
The other oddity, was that our Technician class was filled with nurses, teachers, and other professionals who have NO interest in how radio works. They are just assigned to get a Ham license because their work requires it. (Every school here in So Calif must have two employees who get their Tech license.) So here they are, learning the difference between an inductor and a capacitor, and how to contest, and how to bounce RF off the moon...and they're getting more and more **Censored** off as the time goes by. All they want is an alternate to their cell phone.
So this makes me wonder...why aren't these people just getting decent CB radios (or heck, even FRS radios) and using them instead? I'm confused.
![confused :confused:](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)